It is just after 4pm and the autumn darkness is starting to descend
outside Akava’s Helsinki offices. Sture Fjäder still has a lot of work
to do before his working day is over: there are many things he wants to
change and time is running out. The leader of the Confederation of
Unions for Professional and Managerial Staff in Finland has managed to
strengthen the organisation’s profile in the two and a half years he
has been boss. Sture Fjäder’s ambition when he won the race to become
Akava’s leader two years ago was to be much more visible in the social
debate, and the National Coalition Party member has really succeeded in
that respect.
Challenges through openness
His open approach has also had some of his more old fashioned
colleagues shift uncomfortably in their chairs. They have been used to
solve things behind closed doors, while Sture Fjäder has openly talked
about what has been happening during meetings.
Finland’s trade union culture definitely presents a challenge. He is
also fighting to maintain a confederation with more than half a million
highly educated members organised through 35 trade unions.
Sometimes they don’t have much in common. The largest group among
the members is the teachers’ union with some 100,000 members. Yet the
majority work within the private sector.
In recent years the confederation has recruited five more trade
unions representing 60,000 members, but the successful recruitment
drive has a flip side – getting along with totally new groups is a
challenge.
“We have 35 owners and three negotiating organisations, so it’s
naturally rather difficult.”
Two year labour conflict freeze?
He has also spent long hours negotiating a framework agreement with
employers which guarantees a two year labour conflict freeze. Finland
is in a deep crisis and unions agreed in principle to freeze members’
salaries. Employers also promised to hold back.
“Executives’ salaries must not increase more than employees’ pay
during these two years, then all credibility would be gone and you
would no longer be able to make these kinds of agreements.”
The government supported the solution by regulating tax brackets in
line with inflation, which safeguards people’s purchasing power. The
government’s role in negotiations is comparatively unique, as is the
fact that central issues like pension policies, labour market
legislation and parts of economic policy are delegated to the social
partners.
“Governments have a certain degree of contact with trade unions in
the other Nordic countries too, but we do have a very special situation
in Finland where the state uses a carrot and stick approach.”
Renewal worries
Underlying all this is a deep concern for how the country can manage
to renew itself while central parts of industry, Nokia and the IT
sector, are fighting for survival.
“We’re facing the greatest change to Finnish industrial history
since the country gained independence. We have to hope that we can get
through this crisis by simply creating new things, and to do that you
need the right incentives.”
The incentives he is talking about include cutting income tax, a
topic to which we shall return.
President of the NFS
As this year’s President of the Council of Nordic Trade Unions (NFS)
with more than 8.7 million members, Sture Fjäder is currently speaking
from an even wider platform.
“I feel I have focused a lot on the NFS, perhaps more than many
previous presidents. I am a strong believer in the Nordics. I have
spent a lot of time there, I have been meeting with the secretariat.
During my term we are focusing more on concrete issues than on
communiques.”
The Presidency is regulated by a carefully drawn up system of
rotation which runs all the way to 2022. There is always one president
and six people in the presidium, which is a working committee. The Vice
President will be next year’s President.
The NFS currently has no Secretary General because Loa
Brynjulfsdottir has moved to the Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO)
and her designated successor turned out not to fulfil the NFS
presidium’s criteria.
After much debate, the NFS has developed a joint vision and a clear
strategy comprising three main points which Fjäder sums up like
this:
“Remove border obstacles and secure a free labour market: that is
the first priority. The Nordic model for collective agreements is under
pressure and we need to change it. I think we should do it ourselves.
The third is an economically and socially sustainable working
life.”
This is not his first Nordic mandate. In the 1990s and 2000s he
served as Secretary General at the Nordic Economist Union
(NCF).
“I think you should look at the Nordic region as a whole. If
something happens in Finland, Sweden or Denmark, something major in
terms of initiatives or industrial development, it creates jobs in the
other Nordic countries too because companies are so closely linked
these days. It is business to business and it is networks.”
EU friendly
My colleagues in Oslo read Akava’s Europe Programme and felt it
was more EU friendly than they were used to?
“Yes, but at Akava we are strong believers in Nordic cooperation and
in the Nordic region as a labour market. There is no contradiction in
the fact that we feel Europe to be an opportunity, but yes – we do see
the EU as more of an opportunity than a threat.”
Akava is also a strong proponent of the common currency.
“The euro has been a good thing from a Finnish perspective, through
the eyes of Finnish workers.”
When it comes to the NFS, the most important issue is labour
mobility. The Nordic region has in principle enjoyed a free Nordic
labour market since 1954, but there are still many border obstacles
despite the fact that Ole Norrback’s border obstacle forum has managed
to remove some of them (NLJ has written several articles on
border obstacles over the years).
“This is about safety like pensions, health insurance, unemployment
systems and so on. This is the social part of the labour market and you
obviously have national solutions to pensions, social protection,
insurance and such – these aren’t EU issues.
“The Council of Nordic Ministers doesn’t play a role like the EU or
parliament, issuing directives and such. Therefore we have a
problem.”
Sture Fjäder thinks the group of civil servants now taking over the
work does not represent a good solution.
“You cannot just identify the problems, you have to solve the
problems and here the NFS has an agenda. We want to aim for no border
obstacles in the labour market.”
He points out that the NFS has been a driving force and has
cooperated closely with the Nordic Council of Ministers and Ole
Norrback.
“Perhaps the Nordic Council of Ministers should cooperate even
closer with the NFS and the different countries’ trade unions, because
we have the knowledge and we have the members. Our degree of
organisation is after all so high that we have a right to be heard. Our
unions are called up about this so we can play a part, but of course
politicians are the ones with the mandate – it is they who create
national legislation and this should of course be coordinated to get
rid of border obstacles.”
But does the NFS speak with one voice here – there are those who
even argue in favour of higher border obstacles?
“Yes, but no NFS members have a national policy. On this issue
everyone agrees that we want an open Nordic labour market and that all
border obstacles must go.”
The importance of the Nordic region
To Finland, Nordic cooperation has for a long time represented a
road towards the West, ever since after WW2.
“I sense a renaissance for Nordic cooperation now, there is a great
need for it. If you look at Norway I guess it is the most EU adapted
county in the Nordic region despite it not being an EU member.”
Yet he also sees great potential for improvements of the economic,
political and social model which the Nordic countries to a large degree
share.
“What is the Nordic welfare model? Is it the one we have today, or
is it something which is modernised and less wide reaching – because in
Finland at least we are struggling to pay for it?”
The demographic challenge with an ageing population lends urgency to
the debate around the future of the welfare society. The new EU member
states and southern Europe are putting pressure on Germany and the
Nordic countries to ease their labour legislation and collective
agreements.
The NFS has traditionally argued that politicians must protect the
Nordic collective agreement model.
“That is always on the Nordic Region’s agenda because of our shared
cultural heritage: we have similar societies, we share basic labour
legislation and collective agreements. Depending on which country
you’re in you have more agreements and less legislation or more
legislation and fewer agreements. But it is still the same basic social
model and the same Nordic welfare state.”
Sture Fjäder feels the response has been poor. Trade union
membership is still relatively high in the Nordic region compared to
many EU countries, which makes the NFS a relevant organisation. That’s
why the politicians should listen.
“What we miss in the Nordic region is a social dialogue on working
life between the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers and
employers – that’s the kind of cooperation we should have, just like it
is within the EU, a social dialogue. The NFS wants this and it has not
been promised by politicians. But employers don’t have a joint Nordic
organisation.”
The welfare question
Sture Fjäder’s social views really come to light when he talks about
welfare issues.
“What are our collective responsibilities and what are individual
responsibilities? In all of the Nordic countries there is a debate on
the role of the public sector. The welfare society wasn’t meant to
oversee the outsourcing of your entire life?”
He doesn’t feel this is about ideology. His message is anchored in
Akava’s strategy and does not represent his personal views.
“This isn’t a political question but a question of what kind of
society we want. Should people have more freedom of choice and more
control over their own money instead of paying taxes which are
distributed by politicians in the form of services?”
Finns earning between €3,000 and €6,000 a month make up 18 percent
of all tax payers, but they pay 53 percent of all public
taxes.
“So you’ll understand why we take great interest in what future
investments should be, what can we afford? We must prioritise and this
is the difficult question for politicians. We want to have this debate:
what do we at least keep?
You talk about cutting income tax to an average European level,
but there are different structures and welfare costs money?
“Yes, welfare costs money, but we have a vision which we call vision
2019. We want to create a new welfare society which clearly identifies
what is society’s responsibility and what is the individual’s
responsibility.”
Sture Fjäder thinks education, health care and care for the elderly
are obvious state responsibilities.
“Education, training, knowledge – these are universal benefits, but
should the state interfere in everything or should you allow the
marketplace and individuals to decide?”
Akava’s leaders are worried about the way in which the public
sector’s share of the country’s GDP is growing, and say only a larger
private sector can maintain the public sector.
“The more companies we get the more of an incentive we have, and the
better things will be for Finland and the rest of the Nordic region.
The broader and bigger the private sector, the bigger the public sector
can grow so this is no zero-sum game.”
Member surveys also show that people’s attitude to work has changed.
There is a new generation wanting to be entrepreneurs – not to
save Finland but in order to be their own boss. Economic prosperity is
also a driving force.
“As a worker in Finland you can never grow rich, our taxes are too
high. It is an equalising system, it is the Nordic model and it
guarantees social peace. But there are no incentives to work long hours
and take responsibility for hundreds of people.”
Finland’s service sector also appears under-developed and this is
where you find the greatest potential for new jobs. With a ten percent
increase in employment, Finland would not have any problems at all
financing the public sector.
“Our taxes are so high that people cannot afford to consume.”
