Iceland’s 0utdated benefit system

The Icelandic Prime Minister, Johanna Sigurdardottir, used her National Day speech to point out that most households were still struggling with the fallout of the 2008 economic collapse.

Everything must be done to avoid a long-term unemployment problem,
and to fight for the creation of valuable jobs, she said. 

But to do this the unemployed need support and subsidies. Gylfi
Arnbjörnsson is the leader of Iceland’s Confederation of Trade Unions.
He thinks the unemployment benefit system is designed to help only
those who have been salaried workers, but does nothing for recent
graduates or for those who have never been in work. The benefit rules
were created under very different circumstances. The benefit’s size is
calculated from a worker’s salary level at the time when he or she
became unemployed. That is unfair towards those who have never been in
the labour market, says Mr Arnbjörnsson.

“There has never been this kind of threat of unemployment among
young people in this country. This is a problem which arose from the
economic crisis. The system has not been adjusted to reflect this.”

The benefit system was designed at a time when unemployment by and
large was unknown in Iceland. There are plans to review the system this
autumn, including a rethink of how previous earnings are linked to the
size of the benefit. 

“New graduates who can’t find work get benefits proportionally to
how much they worked during their student years. That is different from
for instance the Danish system, where an engineering graduate gets
money from the engineers’ benefit reserve as if he already had worked
as an engineer.” 

Mr Arnbjörnsson says trade unions protested in vain in the new year
against the government’s decision to lower unemployment benefits for
young people. Municipalities protested too, because they were now put
in charge of paying out benefits.

“The idea was for students to attend summer courses which would
speed up their studies. But there weren’t any courses to attend. Demand
outstripped supply. So they had to go to their local municipality and
claim benefits instead.”

Despite all this, Mr Arnbjörnsson believes it is important to be
able to offer education because it gives the unemployed a proper
challenge while making them more attractive to the labour
market. 

“Most unemployed youths have for various reasons left school early.
Most of them are young working class men. They are the first victims of
cuts since they have no family commitments and too little education and
experience to be attractive to potential employers.”